Social Networking Progress
In some ways I can't help but think social networking has gone so far back these days in terms of how people interact with one another. In days gone by, you used to have friendly communities like this on LJ where if there was something which created a lot of food for thought or you had a lot of things on your mind you were unsure of the best way forward, you could post it up here, and you'd often get a healthy raft of responses, debate and advice.
Nowadays, people have to rely on posting castrated-to-140-letter comments to the likes of Twitter which most folks don't even read, or posting stuff on Facebook/Tumblr, where the primary responses seem to be lazy-click 'xyz likes this, xyz shared this'.
We have progressed so well!
Nowadays, people have to rely on posting castrated-to-140-letter comments to the likes of Twitter which most folks don't even read, or posting stuff on Facebook/Tumblr, where the primary responses seem to be lazy-click 'xyz likes this, xyz shared this'.
We have progressed so well!
no subject
But so much of the stuff that appears on there are just snappy little Twitter style posts and comments, or an endless sea of Likes and Shares. There's nothing social about it. The group I'm in on Facebook, for that Talk Talk band, is very lively. Like on LJ in "the good old days" there can be some very in-depth discussions. But then you'd hope so on a group for a band, if the fans are genuine fans. The general FB areas are just so sparse. And I can't help thinking it's carried on through to places like LJ. People mostly don't want to take the time to read anything longer than a few words, or they just post a simple "cool" or somesuch.
If we're going to replace face to face talking with braindead zombies all gazing into their iPhone screens and grunting at the bus drivers, you'd at least expect decent conversation on Farcebook and Twitter. They need a new name for it because "social" networking is going to land someone in trouble with the false description laws one of these days. ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm not sure if Tumblr and Twitter started the trend (not in the sense of "this is the single way in which things are generally progressing", but in the more minor sense of a trend) of minimal effort/involvement, with the former specialising in one-click "replies", the latter quick quips and throwaway miscellania, but they've certainly leveraged that inclination effectively.
I'd cite Usenet as a fair example to back up your assertion. It isn't immediate, as with anything web-based, but being decentralised, there's no single point of failure, no company deciding arbitrarily to swivel their business model around (or go bust), and being fully standards-based, clients are available for just about anything with a keyboard, with whatever features a developer wants to include. Yet, it fell away in popularity quite drastically post-2000.
Myself, I find LJ the best option, with a reasonable (10K? I forget - it's been a while since I exceeded it =:) cap on reply sizes, full threading, bagfuls of icons, arbitrary restrictions on who can view an individual entry, and most importantly, some rather neat folk to natter and argue with. ^_^
(Oh, is that a new bug? Editing a comment - here, to remove a surplus "s" - reverted the icon to my default)
no subject
Though on the subject of bugs, I do sometimes find journals where the entire comments section wont load and instead a spinning loader just sits on the page. So whilst they may never intentionally remove it, there's a chance LJ will completely break the comments system one of these days!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Twitter I've found very variable. It's very handy for keeping up with folks, but it's just so crippled on its chracter limit that it could never be used as a serious communication tool. People always say its like text messaging... but there's a good reason why they rushed to make phones and networks handle chained SMS messages (and not just for more network profit =;))!